Jump to content
Come try out our new Arcade we just put up, new games added weekly. Link at the top of the website ×

Theory NO MORE!


LtLaszlo

Recommended Posts


  • Member ID:  2593
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  62
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  490
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   977
  • Achievement Points:  5108
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/13/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  11/20/1978
  • Device:  Android

Sweet.  I've been busy working and its nice to see the shit posts continue.

Gonna slap this sucker right here.... mmm...

 

Edited by Izumi
Wrong shit post, but so right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Member ID:  3036
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  31
  • Topic Count:  219
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  9419
  • Content Per Day:  2.08
  • Reputation:   7515
  • Achievement Points:  62539
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  11/29/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/26/2008
  • Device:  Windows

Funny video of Arnie channeling Whitney Houston, and the creator has made many more

AI fakery is all the rage in the news lately of course. Should give everyone pause before believing anything they see on the internet and the media. Even legit media since they will buy into AI fakes also. Quite possible many here with investments in the market lost some money this morning because of an AI fake picture circulated in some foreign media as real. Various authorities had to respond and publicly reassure people it was fake.

When one fake picture causes market losses one imagines what we will be seeing in the next two years when it comes to all the political fakes that will be made up compared to the last election. If this technology was around 6 years ago we would have seen a fully believable film of the infamous Trump 'pee video' as a so-called late October Surprise and a whole lot of people would have believed it without question. And Hillary would have been president.  :shock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Member ID:  3036
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  31
  • Topic Count:  219
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  9419
  • Content Per Day:  2.08
  • Reputation:   7515
  • Achievement Points:  62539
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  11/29/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/26/2008
  • Device:  Windows

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Member ID:  489
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  51
  • Topic Count:  547
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  4668
  • Content Per Day:  0.88
  • Reputation:   5849
  • Achievement Points:  41024
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  14
  • Joined:  09/22/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  01/09/1963
  • Device:  Kindle Fire

I've flipped through the report, Durham doesn't have the gift Navarro has of making his point quickly. It sure doesn't look good for the alphabet agencies attacking a candidate, and then a sitting president. If you have any doubts about the integrity of our government, this should put them to rest, on the negative side. feinstein1.jpg.4d7179b98d372f3ee5c739a981097069.jpg

If however, you consider this a viable representative of congress, all is rosy, and you can remain asleep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Member ID:  3036
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  31
  • Topic Count:  219
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  9419
  • Content Per Day:  2.08
  • Reputation:   7515
  • Achievement Points:  62539
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  11/29/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/26/2008
  • Device:  Windows

The question is, would you replace this person with a younger version of her? The final result in effect being that votes wouldnt be any different? Or would you replace her with someone in your own image? Ask the most vocal voices using this argument and the answer is the latter. Age is just a convenient excuse for many to try and achieve their own partisan goals. Besides you can be younger, and look even younger than your actual years if you have the genes or the money, but still be a brainless and self-absorbed fool that I wouldnt let pump gas into my car. 🏎️

After all, look at next crop of presidential candidates. The two republicans, the front runner would be almost 80 if he won. The runner up, still in his 40's. Yet, if the primaries were all held today the old man would get the nomination. Of course we have an old man that Democrats will likely chose as their next candidate. Our two main contenders, chosen by both respective parties, old men.

Then again, if you want to take simple numbers out of the equation (for both Trump and Biden), the easy argument used, but focus solely on health and physical + mental fitness how do you do that? And by whom? Full medical workups, with full data made public (HIPA not withstanding), by doctors with no bias or relations with the patient? Not simply 'he's good to go'? Psychologists for mental evaluations, also with data?  Imagine if both had to pass extensive psychological exams. My guess, both would have failed. Would have had to be done before the first primary of course so primary voters could made different choices. Interesting to consider who those two would have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.