Sweatnbullets Posted February 11, 2012 Member ID: 213 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 11 Topic Count: 61 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 820 Content Per Day: 0.14 Reputation: 521 Achievement Points: 5654 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/03/09 Status: Offline Last Seen: March 16 Birthday: 06/06/1963 Device: Windows Posted February 11, 2012 Did some research, sounds like we should be looking for Guys with No Recoil and No Spread hacks... Aimbotters are too Obvious to bother me, its the NOT Obvious but Prevalant Add ons I hate. So if ya Spots this stuff, Post it, and Report them! Awards
PrimalFear Posted February 11, 2012 Member ID: 159 Group: **- Inactive Registered Users Followers: 6 Topic Count: 76 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 855 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 93 Achievement Points: 5145 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/02/09 Status: Offline Last Seen: May 9, 2012 Birthday: 09/21/1971 Posted February 11, 2012 Additional things to look for and verify would be that players "stats", look for unusually high kill streaks, insane score per minute and accuracy percentages. Compare these stats to the stats of someone like xCaliber or BigGoliath1 or some other good player, always assume they are "NOT" hacking and then attempt to "Prove" to yourself they are, and then let any BF3 admin know and they'll be gone with a keystroke. Without a spectator mode it would be impossible to see or not see "recoil" or "bullet spread" but there is usually something in those stats that will stand out.
BigGoliath1 Posted February 11, 2012 Member ID: 2928 Group: **- Inactive Registered Users Followers: 9 Topic Count: 17 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 118 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 5 Achievement Points: 784 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/26/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: July 8, 2013 Birthday: 04/02/1975 Posted February 11, 2012 Another way to catch them is if they use a Punkbuster screenshot overlay blocker. Seeing an all black screenshot is also a red flag.
WIMMPYIII Posted February 11, 2012 Member ID: 853 Group: **- Inactive Registered Users Followers: 21 Topic Count: 226 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 646 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 121 Achievement Points: 5685 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/07/09 Status: Offline Last Seen: April 11, 2015 Birthday: 01/25/1988 Posted February 11, 2012 This is BF3s big fail point. Other then screenshots and MD5 checks performed by the anti cheat software there is no way to catch these. Just 1 out of the 2 tools we have had running the last month has cought a hacker for almost every day it has been up. The problem with stats is anyone that cares about getting banned can pad them out very easy. And when there accounts do get out of hand and they are reported to EA all they do is reset there accout to 0 and let them play on. Its a real shame that spectator was not added.
PrimalFear Posted February 13, 2012 Member ID: 159 Group: **- Inactive Registered Users Followers: 6 Topic Count: 76 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 855 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 93 Achievement Points: 5145 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/02/09 Status: Offline Last Seen: May 9, 2012 Birthday: 09/21/1971 Posted February 13, 2012 WIMMPYIII This is BF3s big fail point. Other then screenshots and MD5 checks performed by the anti cheat software there is no way to catch these. Just 1 out of the 2 tools we have had running the last month has cought a hacker for almost every day it has been up. The problem with stats is anyone that cares about getting banned can pad them out very easy. And when there accounts do get out of hand and they are reported to EA all they do is reset there accout to 0 and let them play on. Its a real shame that spectator was not added. +1
Recommended Posts