Blaze

I guess you didn't like mine then!? Well I can have another go if you don't, or in case you forgot I did one for you a while back, here it is again.

Dropping the N word repeatedly after being asked not to.

Wouldn't account for the 6 adults who also died. As far as I know, the FOIA only applies to Citizens, I doubt they would comply with an international request.

Perpetual fear. Much of the reasoning can be gleaned from a Soviet document on controlling the masses. Removal of citizens firearms. Disarm the populous to prevent uprising and resistance. The big one... you WOULD think it would be easy to find out who the Sandy Hook Elementary School Choir children are who sang at the Superb owl are... but you can't. FOIA requests to the school board can provide no documentation regarding such a trip. No permission slips, no list of names, no school board approval and indeed no school board discussion regarding such a trip. I suggest you submit you own FOIA requests yourselves as US citizens and see how far you get. It would certainly help put it to rest. FOIA requests: Death certificates of victims State Trooper 1 helicopter communication transcripts First responders (Newtown police) statements. Dash cam footage (Sinko) with time stamp info. School board approval of superbowl trip and name list of participants. This should do for a start. Get these documents and I will happily take off my tin hat and swap it for a straight jacket.

The problem with those articles though, is they aim to portray the people who believe it was a hoax as monsters who verbally attack the victims relatives at every opportunity. Deflection 101, discredit your opponent and you don't even need to provide an argument. The other problem is, they offer zero evidence to support their argument and they offer no answers to the key questions being asked. Instead they focus on trying to dissuade people from asking questions in the first place. "What kind of monster would ask questions about a tragedy like this?"... how about the people who want to make sure it never happens again. If we had access to all the information, we could all make informed decisions. Wonderful quote from the commissioner in the FOIA hearings... "It doesn't matter if it's published in the papers or on the TV station, what is published in the media is not credible information!".

It's actually surprising how few people would have go be in on it. Just look at the accounts of police and EMTs who turned up and we're left stood around doing nothing because they weren't allowed anywhere near the school. Not one EMT was allowed in the school! No parents of school children other than victims are ever interviewed (except one or two) when 600 + children should be there. It should be a media frenzy for interviews with survivors and fame whores! The families of the victims all moved in to sandy hook within the same time frame and all moved out after within the same time frame. Look at how much money (from the government, not just charitable donations) has been pumped in to sandy hook since and ask yourself if Columbine got the same treatment? Also, would a corrupt school board with a ruined school go along with a lie where nobody had to die in exchange for a new $50 million school and further funds for town improvements? Any discussions go along the lines of "National Security", none disclosures signed. Some people would consider it patriotic to take part, in a twisted kind of way. People who believe guns should be taken away from citizens would be easily persuaded to take part. "Hey, why wait for another Columbine...we could fake one so nobody has to die and we end up with all the anti gun lobby benefits." Why would anyone who thinks like that admit to taking part in a lie when admitting it wasn't true would damage their core belief's cause and entire reason for doing it?

Photoshop CS2 for picture editing. It's available for free from Adobe. Just google it, you'll find how to get it for free legally and there is nothing better without paying. I'll be interested to see what people say about video recording/editing, as I used raptr for a while to record and it was awesome, until it stopped working for cod4 mw.

@@Tron I agree, absolutely they could use a photo of a child and claim they died in that tragedy when in fact they did not! I think it's funny when people accept that for Pakistan, but blindly reject the possibility that it could happen in America!

And just to clarify, at no point did I say that nobody died at Sandy Hook, or that a tragedy didn't take place.

If you "don't care" that public documents are being withheld from the public without good reason, then you have a screw loose! The Freedom Of Information Act is there for a reason!

Why was Sandy Hook victim Noah Pozner also a victim of the Peshawa school shooting in Pakistan?

I haven't said hoax, false flag or cover up! I am asking why these documents have been made by dishonest methods? I am asking why basic documentation, not exempt from FOIA requests are being withheld?

As far as I understood it, as long as you are not able to shoot with impunity and you are not taking advantage of a map exploit, it's all good. Meaning... Getting to unusual areas of the map should be fine, as long as you don't have an unfair advantage such as being hidden from view but can see out, or can shoot out without being able to get hit.

I have emailed the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Newtown for clarification on whether signature stamps are allowed when it comes to Registrar's signatures on death certificates or if a proper signature must be obtained and whether a witness to the signature is necessary. I'm sure any response will be interesting. I haven't seen anywhere it be stated that a stamp is acceptable and it seems odd that acceptability of signature stamps would be outlined in the document I quoted without listing the Registrar as one of those allowed parties, if it were the case.

As an addition, if the signature was rubber stamped (which would not be allowed) why would the signature on the left be different? Why rubber stamp one and not the other if you have to sign two different areas of a document? You would just stamp both.

As a side note...in the UK, the registrar has to sign with special ink only available to them to prevent forgery.

According to the SELECTED STATUTES & RULES: NC LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR DECEDENTS : section 130A-115. Death registration. © When specifically approved by the registrar, an electronic signature or facsimile signature of the Physician, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner is acceptable ONLY in cases where the death is due to natural causes. The Registrar is the important signature and the one who's signature makes it a legal document, it has to be an actual signature.

Uri Gelled has been well and truly debunked by The Amazing Randi!!

Poo bum ball bag!! I doubt I will be able to go, but if circumstances change, I will stick my name down.

Part II

This is the guy to watch! He is Wolfgang Halbig and he is asking some very basic questions which are not being answered.

I appreciate that for some this can be a delicate subject, so please be assured I am not meaning to offend anyone, but I think that the truth is far more important than not hurting someone's feelings... especially when the costs are so high. So I have seen some videos on youtube about Sandy Hook being a hoax or a false flag event and I was just absolutely dismissive of it (although I firmly believe that 9/11 and London 7/7 bombings were the respective governments cunducting false flag events). However, I watched a video of a Freedom Of Information Act hearing regarding requests pertinent to Sandy Hook December 14th 2012. What makes it interesting is the benality of the requests that are being obfuscated: Documentation on maintenance of the school in the year prior to the shooting. Documentation on who ordered the porta loos and when were they ordered. Transcripts of the radio communications from Trooper 1 helicopter Documentation on the "Everybody must check in" road sign, including who ordered it and when? A copy of the check in list? These are just some of the requests, but they are basic information that should in no way be exempt from FOIA requests and yet they have not been released, hence the hearings. A strongly suggest you look up Wolfgang Halbig, he is a school safety consultant, an ex school inspector, an ex teacher, an ex state trooper, an ex serviceman. He was an expert consultant on the Columbine shootings, so this guy knows what he is talking about and wants to make sure this doesn't happen again. Anyway... to the point. I did some digging myself and as far as I know, nobody has yet pointed this out, or noticed this evidence, but the only two death certificates released from the Sandy Hook shootings are that of Adam Lanza and Noah Samuel Pozner. I decided to look at these to see if everything checked out and I discovered that the Registrar's signature in each document (although positioned differently and slightly rescaled) is identical on each document. Not similar, identical. I don't know if I have ever signed my name the same way ever, maybe similar, but not so they would overlay exactly. Anyway, here are the images i made for comparison so you can make your own mind up. Whether you think Sandy Hook happened or not, this is worth further investigation. This one is the death certificates over each other with the form boxes alligned so you can see the sizing is correct. ( I had to resize one of them as the images were slightly different sizes, but once it was scaled down 75% it fit perfectly) Next is the two certificates alligned at the Registrar's signature, you can see quite clearly that the signature is the same. A little bolder, but that happens when documents are scanned by different machines and uploaded at different qualities. Lastly is just the signature overlayed for clarity. So regardless of what you think about Sandy Hook, these documents are clearly forgeries as the Registrar has to sign the document to make it valid. This is not something that can be stamped or digitally signed, it has to be signed by the registrar with a pen. The only possible explanation is that the signature has been added digitally from a previous copy of the swignature, but as these two documents have the signature overlapping the printed text, it has to have been taken from a 3rd document and digitally added to both. If so, why add them at awkward positions other than to deliberatley make it look like the signatures are done naturally. You can also see that signatures change with each iteration by comparing them to the signature on the left side of the registrar (written vertically) because this signature is visibly different. Also, the Chief Medical Examiner's signature is different between the two documents as would be expected. If this needs to be moved to the political section, please could you add me to that section so I can see it.

Surely BEHIND the belt! Losing anything from under the belt would be terrible!!

Love it

Dirty pillows Fun bags Top bollocks Shirt potatoes Eyes (we've all done it.... "she has a lovely pair of eyes")