Blaze

I looked through a couple of map sites but haven't found it yet. I got the feeling the name would jump out at me.

Yep, it's in there!

Sorry I don't know it's name, but I recognise the map! You can climb on all the balconies and the middle roof. You spawn at diagonally opposite corners from each other and there are vehicles in the streets you can use for cover. Not been in the rotation for ages. Good map.

I like it! I hate the fact it has to be 200X200, you lose all detail and your image goes from a HD beauty to a Spectrum ZX load screen.

I really like this one, but only for when we bring out a sports drink!

Forgot to do a 200 x 200...

I guess you didn't like mine then!? Well I can have another go if you don't, or in case you forgot I did one for you a while back, here it is again.

Dropping the N word repeatedly after being asked not to.

Wouldn't account for the 6 adults who also died. As far as I know, the FOIA only applies to Citizens, I doubt they would comply with an international request.

Perpetual fear. Much of the reasoning can be gleaned from a Soviet document on controlling the masses. Removal of citizens firearms. Disarm the populous to prevent uprising and resistance. The big one... you WOULD think it would be easy to find out who the Sandy Hook Elementary School Choir children are who sang at the Superb owl are... but you can't. FOIA requests to the school board can provide no documentation regarding such a trip. No permission slips, no list of names, no school board approval and indeed no school board discussion regarding such a trip. I suggest you submit you own FOIA requests yourselves as US citizens and see how far you get. It would certainly help put it to rest. FOIA requests: Death certificates of victims State Trooper 1 helicopter communication transcripts First responders (Newtown police) statements. Dash cam footage (Sinko) with time stamp info. School board approval of superbowl trip and name list of participants. This should do for a start. Get these documents and I will happily take off my tin hat and swap it for a straight jacket.

The problem with those articles though, is they aim to portray the people who believe it was a hoax as monsters who verbally attack the victims relatives at every opportunity. Deflection 101, discredit your opponent and you don't even need to provide an argument. The other problem is, they offer zero evidence to support their argument and they offer no answers to the key questions being asked. Instead they focus on trying to dissuade people from asking questions in the first place. "What kind of monster would ask questions about a tragedy like this?"... how about the people who want to make sure it never happens again. If we had access to all the information, we could all make informed decisions. Wonderful quote from the commissioner in the FOIA hearings... "It doesn't matter if it's published in the papers or on the TV station, what is published in the media is not credible information!".

It's actually surprising how few people would have go be in on it. Just look at the accounts of police and EMTs who turned up and we're left stood around doing nothing because they weren't allowed anywhere near the school. Not one EMT was allowed in the school! No parents of school children other than victims are ever interviewed (except one or two) when 600 + children should be there. It should be a media frenzy for interviews with survivors and fame whores! The families of the victims all moved in to sandy hook within the same time frame and all moved out after within the same time frame. Look at how much money (from the government, not just charitable donations) has been pumped in to sandy hook since and ask yourself if Columbine got the same treatment? Also, would a corrupt school board with a ruined school go along with a lie where nobody had to die in exchange for a new $50 million school and further funds for town improvements? Any discussions go along the lines of "National Security", none disclosures signed. Some people would consider it patriotic to take part, in a twisted kind of way. People who believe guns should be taken away from citizens would be easily persuaded to take part. "Hey, why wait for another Columbine...we could fake one so nobody has to die and we end up with all the anti gun lobby benefits." Why would anyone who thinks like that admit to taking part in a lie when admitting it wasn't true would damage their core belief's cause and entire reason for doing it?

Photoshop CS2 for picture editing. It's available for free from Adobe. Just google it, you'll find how to get it for free legally and there is nothing better without paying. I'll be interested to see what people say about video recording/editing, as I used raptr for a while to record and it was awesome, until it stopped working for cod4 mw.

@@Tron I agree, absolutely they could use a photo of a child and claim they died in that tragedy when in fact they did not! I think it's funny when people accept that for Pakistan, but blindly reject the possibility that it could happen in America!

And just to clarify, at no point did I say that nobody died at Sandy Hook, or that a tragedy didn't take place.

If you "don't care" that public documents are being withheld from the public without good reason, then you have a screw loose! The Freedom Of Information Act is there for a reason!

Why was Sandy Hook victim Noah Pozner also a victim of the Peshawa school shooting in Pakistan?

I haven't said hoax, false flag or cover up! I am asking why these documents have been made by dishonest methods? I am asking why basic documentation, not exempt from FOIA requests are being withheld?

As far as I understood it, as long as you are not able to shoot with impunity and you are not taking advantage of a map exploit, it's all good. Meaning... Getting to unusual areas of the map should be fine, as long as you don't have an unfair advantage such as being hidden from view but can see out, or can shoot out without being able to get hit.

I have emailed the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Newtown for clarification on whether signature stamps are allowed when it comes to Registrar's signatures on death certificates or if a proper signature must be obtained and whether a witness to the signature is necessary. I'm sure any response will be interesting. I haven't seen anywhere it be stated that a stamp is acceptable and it seems odd that acceptability of signature stamps would be outlined in the document I quoted without listing the Registrar as one of those allowed parties, if it were the case.

As an addition, if the signature was rubber stamped (which would not be allowed) why would the signature on the left be different? Why rubber stamp one and not the other if you have to sign two different areas of a document? You would just stamp both.

As a side note...in the UK, the registrar has to sign with special ink only available to them to prevent forgery.

According to the SELECTED STATUTES & RULES: NC LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR DECEDENTS : section 130A-115. Death registration. © When specifically approved by the registrar, an electronic signature or facsimile signature of the Physician, Physician Assistant or Nurse Practitioner is acceptable ONLY in cases where the death is due to natural causes. The Registrar is the important signature and the one who's signature makes it a legal document, it has to be an actual signature.

Uri Gelled has been well and truly debunked by The Amazing Randi!!

Poo bum ball bag!! I doubt I will be able to go, but if circumstances change, I will stick my name down.