BigPapaDean Posted March 1, 2013 Member ID: 1128 Group: *** Clan Members Followers: 78 Topic Count: 1214 Topics Per Day: 0.22 Content Count: 6563 Content Per Day: 1.17 Reputation: 4443 Achievement Points: 63743 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 6 Joined: 02/13/10 Status: Offline Last Seen: 3 hours ago Birthday: 10/21/1954 Device: Windows Posted March 1, 2013 http://autos.yahoo.com/news/10-vehicles-under--50k-that-hold-their-value-the-worst-021709767.html?page=2 Awards
Expedition Posted March 7, 2013 Member ID: 2712 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 152 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 193 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 89 Achievement Points: 2109 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/31/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: August 1, 2021 Birthday: 07/13/1964 Posted March 7, 2013 Nice article. I bought a new 2004 Expedition (hence the game Alias name) and it was a wonderful rig for my family of 4 but man did it drink the fuel. I was getting about 13 mgp in town and 16 on the highway (with the wind to my back). I traded it off for a Lincoln Navigator, which got even worse mpg than the Expedition... Go figure... Awards
PingLo Posted March 7, 2013 Member ID: 1103 Group: **- Inactive Registered Users Followers: 64 Topic Count: 119 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 1977 Content Per Day: 0.35 Reputation: 1122 Achievement Points: 15642 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/08/10 Status: Offline Last Seen: October 16, 2013 Birthday: 01/01/2012 Posted March 7, 2013 About 14 months ago got rid of my '06 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT/8 daily driver which originally cost me $44k in March of 2006. It still retained 45% of it's value after almost 6 YEARS! Never garaged, occasionally raced, every rim was rashed and it was not pristine by any estimation.
Recommended Posts