PimpedOutPete

Thanks for the post Canada... The map you are referring to does have a glitch and is destined to beremoved. As far as I know, the rocks are part of the map. There are several ways to get on the Rocks. Any use of a glitch in which you are not seen by other players or can not be shot in return is prohibited... where u will be banned after several warnings.. As far as im concerned, the rocks are not a glitch.. The admin that mentioned this to you should respond as well... Thx again Canada. Pete

Oh..and i luv you guys as well..you bunch of tight ass frigid bastards..(lol)

Ferret PimpedOutPete Prime example of my point... Bachman's response to being asked about her thoughts on gay & civil rights.. http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.html#/video/bestoftv/2011/08/15/exp.ac.kth.bachmann.cnn?hpt=hp_t2 So don't vote for her. You have that right. Until socialist Progressives successfully subvert the Constitution that you apparently feel is so outdated, you DO still have the right to vote for whoever the heck you want to, and speak your mind against whoever you want to. That right is provided to you by the "outdated" 1770's Constitution. You're welcome. You claim to be somewhat "conservative"..... but I know conservatives & conservatism pretty dog-gone well - and you sir, are not very conservative - at least as American conservatives define the term. I don't doubt that you are indeed a "conservative Canadian" would honestly put you about 5- 10 notches "left of center" in America. I respect that, but it is what it is. That being the case, as with McCain, we conservatives saw what happens when we let conservative-disliking liberals choose our candidate for us. Taking the advice of people that desire your failure is NOT a good idea. That won't happen again in this election, I assure you. But cheers.... enjoy the Bachman-bashing. Maybe you can get some Beck & Palin bashing in, too. The outdated Constitution ensures your right to do so, and it is making a comeback, like it or not. Love ya Petey, my friend..... but leave the "conservatism", to conservatives. Im a fiscal conservative... but im progressive when it comes to social subjects... As for being a conservative Canadian... It seems their ildeals about being fiscal are more conservative than the republicans.. They already give the provinces alot of powers and enforce alot more regulations. As for McCain.. He is a moderate and without him it would have Obama 50 - Republicans 0.... ok, they would have kicked a field goal at the end.. As for Bachman.... When is it bashing when a candidate wont answer a question.. and besides, you and Hx and reset of the Tea gang are avoiding the question... Why isnt she answering the question..

lol..love it..

LilAcorn ugh u had to bring up this end of the world 2012 crap again, funstick?!?!? FUCK YOU! I still say who thinks we all will die, are the ones who are gunna die that year.... blah... Ya Funstick.. U just wrecked my high u dumbass! I was having such a great 2011! hahaha

lol priceless...

You are welcome you old bastard!! Cheers buddy

Welcome Moose to the great disfunctional family you will ever be apart of.. Cheers

Prime example of my point... Bachman's response to being asked about her thoughts on gay & civil rights.. http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.html#/video/bestoftv/2011/08/15/exp.ac.kth.bachmann.cnn?hpt=hp_t2

Wow, that should be a public device message for why NOT to take crack! That's fucked up..

That's because the Republicans are still negotiating a hand job in the capital washroom.. Those cheap bastards lol.. Good one Hx...

So u can log on as a single player? If that's the case it's a sound card conflict.. I can't recall how to fix that at the moment but when I get home.. I will check an PM you..

Lol.. On a roll judge.. Great job

Great job again

hxtr PimpedOutPete hxtr Blackbart Ron Paul for President Herman Cain for Vice President... Iran.... cant have that. I love Ron Paul............... to death. But he needs to stay doing what he does best. Bring out the conversation. I so want to have him as pres... but he just wont get elected. I have seen some radical videos and he will be made out to be a fool. I agree with him on some crazy issues 50/50 but the rest 100%. I dont know the truth. Feds.. he is right on. But we need someone with less baggage. Perry.. lots of baggage. This is going to be harder than any of us think. I dont want to be handed a candidate like McCain that no one will vote for that the BOUGHT LIBERAL MEDIA gave us last time. Supportive of him during the primaries then NUKED like in Crysis during the election. He was handed to us vy that lib media. Does anyone else see that? Lets not let that happened again.. but it will. McCain forced to produce Birth Certificate knowing full well he is and was AMC. Obama.. takes 2 years to produce one and it has 7 layers left behind from Photoshop. And anyone who asked for it was labeled a racist. And if you disbleave the fake one produced... you will get a FEMA camp invite. hahahaha Obama 2012... might as well get used to it.. What's up with take on the main stream media! Haha.. Build a bridge! It's called the main stream media because they represent the overwhelming majority of Americans. Of course the GOP candidates survive the primaries, it's because they avoid the tough questions asked by the main stream media... I want tough questions. The job isn't the night shift at the Quickie Mart.. Yes that makes sense... overwhelming voice right. Like in Germany the majority voice overcomes common sense. I understand Pete. One channel is so evil... Fox. The Devil!!! Which no one wants to watch but more watch them than the rest combines. I might be talking out my ass on that last part. AM Radio... is hated. WHY???? What lib AM radio show does shit? Name one that beats Rush, Glenn, Neal, fucking Hannity, Savage. Is that not the majority. Listen to these fucks. TV is so limited. But a closed mind.. is closed. AM... they dont sing the same song in sequence. I can prove lib media does. No Fox News has it's rightful place... I have been critical of Fox in the past for their faults media coverage but the same could made about MSNBC. As for AM radio? It's an older and cheaper method of getting your message out. I can afford better and media coverage can include radio, Internet and TV. Instead of eluding to the majority as sheep and criticizing the media... Just state your case and convince us.. That's all we ask.

Happy Birthday buddy.. I hope u have great day! Cheers

Ferret PimpedOutPete It's called the main stream media because they represent the overwhelming majority of Americans. Oooooh, you lost it there, Petey. I must call Bullshit. Gallup is about the most respected & objective polliing organizations in America. (Check ANY other poll to compare, if you wish) Gallup says as of August 1st, (and is consistent with other polls) that 41% of Americans consider themselves "Conservative".... 36% are "moderates".... and a mere 21% as "liberal". Look it up for yourself, here is a Gallup link : http://www.gallup.com/poll/148745/political-ideology-stable-conservatives-leading.aspx Almost TWICE as many Americans call themselves conservative as liberal. Yet in study after study after study after study, report after report - statistics show an OVERWHLEMING liberal bias in mainstream media "news reporting" (I can provide links to about 50 if you ask)..... if you deny that EVERY TV "news" source besides FoxNews, and EVERY newspaper/ magazine source besides the Wall Street Journal isn't overtly Obama/ Democrat biased - then you lose 50 credibility points. THAT isn't even really arguable. At LEAST 75% of the media is overtly liberal, and only 21% of the population is. Don't believe ol' Ferret, look THAT up for yourself. That is NOT "an overwhelming majority of Americans".... that is outright horseshit. (Meant respectfully). I'm a conservative Ferret, that doesn't make me Republican and vicversa. If u continue to pigeon hole most of America, you will lose my vote and many like me. Mainstream media are controlled by one thing only.. That's ratings.... If I turn off the channel, then u lose my viewership.. Calling us liberals, complaining about the media, playing the victim card gets u one thing.. Nothing but alienating the people u need to reach... That's politics!!!!!

Thank u for the history lesion, brings back memories of my poli-chy classes in university. I understand your great need to explain or sway me on benefits of the Tea Party Movement. I am not nor will I ever be a federalist. I have firm beliefs that lesions learned from the past help build a bright future. We also cant live the past as well. This is not 1780 and America is not Longer the same country. Retain the values of the past but make dam sure u live in today's world. As for the media? The mainstream media does not call the Tea Party terrorist, the leftiests Yes, but they do not speak for the vast majority. Why the fascination with the rights need to be the victim? Fox News panders to the conservative movement correct? It's not the other way around.. Then why does the right think that everyone that tunes into middle American news are sheep? That's so hypocritical. The reality is main stream news reflect how most Americans feel.. If they didn't, they would simply turn the channel. The reason main stream media toss hard questions to extreme candidates is because they are asking what most of us feel.. What do u stand for and why? If u can't withstand the scrutiny or tough questions.. Then best stay away from politics..

Well done my friend.

hxtr PimpedOutPete Ferret Pete/ Nick..... You keep saying that you want details, details, details, and specifics to the Nth degree. I respectfully submit that you can find a GREAT number of details, if you go to the candidates' websites, Tea Party websites, conservative websites, or (gasp) even watch FoxNews. If you are waiting for ANY objective or honest evaluation or reporting on conservatives or their agenda/ statements to pop up on CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Huffington Post, New York Times, PBS, NPR, or Comedy Central - you will be waiting a LOOOOOOOONG time. Those "GlennBeck is Satan" websites that Pete seems to frequently visit, just aren't a good source for objectively presented, honest information. In fact, they *may* be slanted in the other direction. The election is well over a year away, and more details will be fleshed out once the primaries are over. I want more specifics of Obama's "debt reduction plan", and I'm not getting it, even from dutiful Democrat networks. Same for "job creation", "economic recovery", "ending bi-partisanship", etc., etc.. So welcome to the club. But I'm telling you, you have to actually WANT to hear answers, before you can actually "hear" them. I have been married long enough to understand "selective perception" is a real thing (I can't hear the kids crying at 2 AM like my wife can, and she can yell in my ear from 3 inches away to clean out the garage and I never hear a word ). And I think maybe you do the same thing I do sometimes, which is just hearing what you want to hear. Respectfully submitted. Thanks for your post Ferret. I do watch Fox News, but they are as much a part of the problem (or more so) than anyone else. I never seen a news organization pander to political party as Fox does.. Hell MSNBC only dream they could do the same. Just take any given day and you will read multiple complaints on President Obama and the democrats in general (that's just the front page), MSNBC? Maybe some.. So why do the conservative delegate steer away from main stream media? Why do u think they do? It's obvious... The election is 2012, not 2011... They know perfectly well that there is no votes being won by answering tough questions. So they stick to the cream puff network and answer questions if they tried the deep-fried Butter at the Iowa straw poll. I have been to their websites (most) and Nick is right.. They are vague. can you please repeat and leave out the Canadian.. hahaha so joking.. but I will try and read again and try and understand what you are saying.. Love you Pete... you mean so well and I value that. Fuck off Hx... U bat shit crazy bastard! Haha

hxtr PimpedOutPete hxtr Ferret PimpedOutPete No overlap in jurisdiction... More government control to the states while some key areas remain under federal law. Does that make me a moderate republican now?.. (lol) I don't know about that, but it sure puts you in direct conflict with the Progressive agenda. The question Pete.. how do we get there.. who do we elect to see that happen. I would like you to tell me what democrat will take us down that road. This should be funny. What democrat? Lol... I'm kind of stuck with one or should I say we are. If Obama wins I'm hoping he will have his tail firmly between his legs and will begin listening to the vast majority of Americans, not the extremists. So hard to convince you... imagine the rest of the country who aint paying attention to shit. At least you think about it. We are fucked!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not their fault.. they been brain washed. I can be swaid to vote GOP... I have been in the past, several times.. Depends on the candidate.

hxtr Blackbart Ron Paul for President Herman Cain for Vice President... Iran.... cant have that. I love Ron Paul............... to death. But he needs to stay doing what he does best. Bring out the conversation. I so want to have him as pres... but he just wont get elected. I have seen some radical videos and he will be made out to be a fool. I agree with him on some crazy issues 50/50 but the rest 100%. I dont know the truth. Feds.. he is right on. But we need someone with less baggage. Perry.. lots of baggage. This is going to be harder than any of us think. I dont want to be handed a candidate like McCain that no one will vote for that the BOUGHT LIBERAL MEDIA gave us last time. Supportive of him during the primaries then NUKED like in Crysis during the election. He was handed to us vy that lib media. Does anyone else see that? Lets not let that happened again.. but it will. McCain forced to produce Birth Certificate knowing full well he is and was AMC. Obama.. takes 2 years to produce one and it has 7 layers left behind from Photoshop. And anyone who asked for it was labeled a racist. And if you disbleave the fake one produced... you will get a FEMA camp invite. hahahaha Obama 2012... might as well get used to it.. What's up with take on the main stream media! Haha.. Build a bridge! It's called the main stream media because they represent the overwhelming majority of Americans. Of course the GOP candidates survive the primaries, it's because they avoid the tough questions asked by the main stream media... I want tough questions. The job isn't the night shift at the Quickie Mart..

hxtr Ferret PimpedOutPete No overlap in jurisdiction... More government control to the states while some key areas remain under federal law. Does that make me a moderate republican now?.. (lol) I don't know about that, but it sure puts you in direct conflict with the Progressive agenda. The question Pete.. how do we get there.. who do we elect to see that happen. I would like you to tell me what democrat will take us down that road. This should be funny. What democrat? Lol... I'm kind of stuck with one or should I say we are. If Obama wins I'm hoping he will have his tail firmly between his legs and will begin listening to the vast majority of Americans, not the extremists.

Ferret Pete/ Nick..... You keep saying that you want details, details, details, and specifics to the Nth degree. I respectfully submit that you can find a GREAT number of details, if you go to the candidates' websites, Tea Party websites, conservative websites, or (gasp) even watch FoxNews. If you are waiting for ANY objective or honest evaluation or reporting on conservatives or their agenda/ statements to pop up on CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Huffington Post, New York Times, PBS, NPR, or Comedy Central - you will be waiting a LOOOOOOOONG time. Those "GlennBeck is Satan" websites that Pete seems to frequently visit, just aren't a good source for objectively presented, honest information. In fact, they *may* be slanted in the other direction. The election is well over a year away, and more details will be fleshed out once the primaries are over. I want more specifics of Obama's "debt reduction plan", and I'm not getting it, even from dutiful Democrat networks. Same for "job creation", "economic recovery", "ending bi-partisanship", etc., etc.. So welcome to the club. But I'm telling you, you have to actually WANT to hear answers, before you can actually "hear" them. I have been married long enough to understand "selective perception" is a real thing (I can't hear the kids crying at 2 AM like my wife can, and she can yell in my ear from 3 inches away to clean out the garage and I never hear a word ). And I think maybe you do the same thing I do sometimes, which is just hearing what you want to hear. Respectfully submitted. What's my take on small government? Well read my post prior to. I pretty well mapped out what federal/ state jurisdiction consisted of... This would reduce redundant departments and hand more power to constituents and state legislatures. I appreciate your thoughts on social subjects Ferret but that's not the official GOP (Tea Party) outline on them. You my friend have democratic thoughts and feelings on this subject. I know u know that the GOP (TeaParty) stance on these issues are complete difftent, but they are not talking, and for good reason.

Ferret Pete/ Nick..... You keep saying that you want details, details, details, and specifics to the Nth degree. I respectfully submit that you can find a GREAT number of details, if you go to the candidates' websites, Tea Party websites, conservative websites, or (gasp) even watch FoxNews. If you are waiting for ANY objective or honest evaluation or reporting on conservatives or their agenda/ statements to pop up on CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Huffington Post, New York Times, PBS, NPR, or Comedy Central - you will be waiting a LOOOOOOOONG time. Those "GlennBeck is Satan" websites that Pete seems to frequently visit, just aren't a good source for objectively presented, honest information. In fact, they *may* be slanted in the other direction. The election is well over a year away, and more details will be fleshed out once the primaries are over. I want more specifics of Obama's "debt reduction plan", and I'm not getting it, even from dutiful Democrat networks. Same for "job creation", "economic recovery", "ending bi-partisanship", etc., etc.. So welcome to the club. But I'm telling you, you have to actually WANT to hear answers, before you can actually "hear" them. I have been married long enough to understand "selective perception" is a real thing (I can't hear the kids crying at 2 AM like my wife can, and she can yell in my ear from 3 inches away to clean out the garage and I never hear a word ). And I think maybe you do the same thing I do sometimes, which is just hearing what you want to hear. Respectfully submitted. I would never say I was an authority on American Politics. I lived many years there and most likely will retire there as well. What disadvantages both Nick and myself have, we do also have major advantages in living in cultures different from America, living in a alternate political system.. Knowledge is invaluable. You are gravely mistaken if u think most moderates or democrats are leftist liberals like President Obama. There are many small government moderate democrats like myself. You are also wrong if u think all democrats want to spend money, Clinton was a small government democrat and moved the party to the right when it came to economics. If the GOP (Tea Party) want to regain power and implement their policy, they then better listening to my concerns and Nicks or u will lose the VAST majority of Americans who feel the same..