hxtr

I don't sleep near as much now that I don't smoke. I wake up sometimes and can't go back to sleep. When I smoked... I could go to sleep almost on command just about and I woke up ready to go because I wanted to get up and smoke. I dream shitloads more now that I don't smoke as well or I remember the dreams.... one or the other. Sometimes some crazy ass dreams and they keep me up thinking about them. But I prefer to not smoke. I'm getting too old for that shit... and I have my water which has helped in tremendous ways. Anxieties have been eliminated just about drinking it. I hate anxiety which can be part of your problems. The things we can't get out of our head will keep you up at times. My suggestion... do some kind of activity until you are exhausted.... walking, running, cleaning.. something. You will sleep like a baby when you are that tired. Good luck brother!!! hope you get some answers soon.

hahahahaha that was not funny at all hahahhahahaha

Because Obama Care was a lie and they admitted some of the lies. But sure you missed that.

Ted Cruz is correct. You should compare it to Obama Care. In the end you will be paying out your fucking nose.

I'm am in love with my Samsung s5. Great phone... had to get an extended battery though. So now it weighs 11oz which is fine. I can tell it is in my hands where before way to light. Not having to charge but every 4 to 5 days is a cool thing. And it charges fast as shit. The Note is a good phone. Love the screen. I don't have an opinion about the rest except anything iFuckingTunes related products. iTunes sucks donkey dicks!!!!!!!!

I have no comment. This conversation went from a loving dog having a blast to my legs with piss, possibly cum and not sure what else. And one of you doesn't even want to be a dog to do it.

I can agree with all of that Sammy. BTW Amazon is just 5 from my house. What a monster of a building. Over a half mile long and about 3 football fields wide. HUGE!!!!!

Do you all notice something about Stingers Tat and now Sig?

Well I am glad you support such nonsense DJ. lol Wait till they regulate speech on the Internet like they do in the UK.

DJ looks to me a Socialist Program. I don't see the free market pushing for this. I see Government taking over... again.

That was funny as hell. I am feeling quite warm after seeing that.

Chris Chrisy will have to pay doubt for humping Jerry Jone's leg on live TV.

Looks like Net Neutrality has already hit XI. hahahahaha And their is this thing call donation that can pay for stuff like that.

I got to hang out with the Australian's Navy once back in 1990 in Guam. We had a great time. Bunch of good blocks and them fucks can drink some piss.

Bad ass.... that was cool.... loved the screams before he jumps in. hahhahaa

I never realized this clan was so infested by so many Australian's.

To sum it up.... the internet will be like watching TV. If you want more content you will pay. It will be like a utility and government regulated. There for you will pay taxes on the usage you use.. bandwidth. And yes Netflix users will pay more. This is just the start. As for me being for NN. Bullshit... like I said pass the bill first then find out what it is about. You are going to as Sammy said.... be fed lots of spin. You will be convinced of a Lie once again much like Affordable Health Care. Nothing affordable about it and 100% about CONTROL.

And IPv4 is still in use. I am speaking of if they removed support for IPv4 Internet wide. That changes everything. Hard to control the ports used in IPv4 like 80 for web, 443 SSL, 25 SMTP, 21 FTP, 23 Telnet... and the list goes on. Will they have more control over ports in IPv6 that they don't in IPv4. Will one day being able to host your own server how you want to.. is what I think could be in jeopardy. XI servers will have to pay more due to the traffic used. Like Netflix users will have to pay more. But again just a theory on the IPv6. Lets pass the bill first then find out what's in it.

I am very well aware of the IPv4 imitations. Does not change my opinion. And no the 10 range is not owned by IBM. That is a private set of address like 192.168.0.0 --- 192.168.255.255 with a subnet 255.255.0.0 or Class B. 10.0.0.0 is a class A address with this subnet of 255.0.0.0. Anyone can used this range as long not on the Net. You must have a routeable address... not a private address. But IBM does have a Class A or two.... just not the 10 range.

I was ill in 2006/2007 when I learned about it and what would happen. But no one would listen to us Conspiracy Theorists. Here come IPv6.... or I think that is how they will lock it down.. but that remains to be seen. Just a Theory. lol

This is a fantastic thread. hahahhaa

Shit... I break laws when I'm still sleeping.

BB got banned and I am now Bama's bitch here on XI is all. We got rid of BB so Bama and I could be together. Rugger was a huge help pushing the button. He took out 4 in one shot. Deserves them right!!!!!

Rugger you don't have to explain to Boo Yaa why you banned him, BB, Lady and that brat. Let him figure it out.

I told you back in 2006 and 2007 this would happen..... and now it is. The GOP ain't going to fight this. This is 100% going to happen. WSJ: GOP to Battle Obama over Net Neutrality Rules Republicans will be stepping up the fight this month against the Obama administration’s proposals to control broadband Internet providers in the battle over net neutrality, The Wall Street Journal reported. The Federal Communications Commission is set to vote on new regulations in February that would classify broadband as a utility and make providers face far greater government restrictions. Supporters of the regulations say they are being created to safeguard net neutrality, the notion that all Internet traffic should be treated the same, with one speed for all online traffic. However, Federal Communications Commission Commissioner Mike O'Reilly has admitted that web surfers would be hit with an "immediate" new tax for their Internet use if net neutrality becomes the law. O’Reilly said that if the FCC sides with President Barack Obama, who threw his support behind net neutrality after the November elections, Internet providers would promptly pass a new set of costs on to their customers. But Republicans, who are set to run both the House and the Senate, believe the proposals are another case of government overreach and plan to fight them. Conservatives, in particular, say that the strict controls in the industry will hold back Internet innovation for years to come. “The regulatory tools at the FCC’s disposal are outdated and its previous efforts to create rules to regulate the Internet were struck down by the courts,” South Dakota Sen. John Thune said. “It’s hard to imagine that its new attempt will escape legal challenges and avoid the kind of regulatory uncertainty that harms Internet innovation and investment.” Republicans could introduce legislation to block the proposals or slash the FCC’s budget, or they may even attempt to apply the rarely-used Congressional Review Act that permits Congress to invalidate rules brought out by federal agencies, the Journal noted. But the president has the power to veto any such move. “There are many paths that opponents of strong net neutrality rules can follow in the Congress,” Gene Kimmelman, president of the group Public Knowledge, which supports strong net neutrality rules, told the newspaper. “However if the White House remains firmly in favor of strong net neutrality rules, all legislation is likely to fail.” In the upcoming weeks before the FCC votes on the new measures, Republican-led committees in both chambers are expected to put FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler through the ringer while attempting to prevent the passage of the new regulations on broadband providers, the Journal reported.