ENG4INE

Love the paintball server, I wish I found more people on it.

Sickening

Agreed.

Welcome.

I know I am late replying as I haven't been around much lately. HAPPY BIRTHDAY to my good buddy Gump.

Welcome to the clan!

Welcome Buddy.

I think that would be awesome. Friendly fire Fridays? LoL

I stumbled across this knife while looking for an affordable Out The Front (OTF) knife. I watched several reviews and was lucky enough to find one for $35 (free shipping) with a SS plain edge. Just wanted to share this deal with all of my knife toting XI friends. ENJOY! Check your local laws to make sure it's legal to own one where you live. www.uniqueblade.com/index.php?p=catalog&mode=search&search_in=all&search_str=Lightning+OTF&x=0&y=0 http://youtu.be/57ZUiu2BVo8

Welcome to >XI<. Enjoy your stay. Meals are served at 0600, 1200, and 1800.

Congratulations, You can now hunt any animal on the planet.

It takes a real man to come out and say it like that. Strong work.

Oh Boy.....

Welcome to the forums. Look forward to shooting you some more in game.

Easy fix for spawn campers, go to spec video them in x fire send it to an admin for warning or ban. You people make it sound so much more difficult than it is. Everyone wants to bitch, but no one wants to follow the very specific protocol we are to follow for the repurcutions to take place. Sheepdog I am not submitting any changes just that the people quit going into the deepest hole they find and won't move as long as I am in the server. That's all nothing more! Lol! lol dean i think your letting your ego run wild with you lmfao Check yourself dean. 7toesKY made the comment about your ego. Not me. your going to tell me I have to do it even when we have admins in the server and warning them and they still bitch about anyone saying anything something is a bit fucked up with that just my 2 cents like I said I am done anyways. You never mentioned anything about admins in your first post. Also I never told you what you "have to do". I simply shared some advice on how to fix your problem. The admins have to get the same proof members do and post it in the adm. section. If it were pissing me off and causing me not to be on the server I would do something about it by videoing it and submiting it for review by ALL admins. I wouldn't wait for an admin to self initiate action. Hell get Chile, he'll ban hammer em! LoL I give this advice because I got tired of people glitching on the COD5 servers. I took video of them and two people were banned. We don't have glitcher's for the most part anymore. It's easy you just have to want it and be willing to put a little work in, but your "done anyways" so see ya!

Easy fix for spawn campers, go to spec video them in x fire send it to an admin for warning or ban. You people make it sound so much more difficult than it is. Everyone wants to bitch, but no one wants to follow the very specific protocol we are to follow for the repurcutions to take place. Sheepdog I am not submitting any changes just that the people quit going into the deepest hole they find and won't move as long as I am in the server. That's all nothing more! Lol! lol dean i think your letting your ego run wild with you lmfao Check yourself dean. 7toesKY made the comment about your ego. Not me.

I think the key here is being able to articulate the suspicion. There are cops that have great instincts, but can't articulate the reasoning behind them. A judge isn't going to let that fly. And there are those that have been on the job too long and suspect everyone of illegal activities. My wife was on stakeout with another officer that saw a guy riding his bicycle down the street. He stops and questions the guy believing him to be a friend of the suspect and thought he was a lookout for him - my wife thought he was an average Joe riding his bike. It turned out they (the police) were not only watching the wrong house, but were also on the wrong street! I agree with the first sentence, ok first two sentences. After that the dynamic of the post being specifically about stopping armed subject's after 911 calls are received changed. I can't speak to any of it as there isn't any specific case law I can reference on anything you posted about what judges let fly, paranoid cops being on the job to long or the specific case your wife experienced. LoL

There are few rules on XI and that's why I'm a member. It seems like someone is always trying to come up with some newfangled rule. Dean your one bad ass mofo with a knife, the is no doubt about that. However what your proposing would be the same as someone coming in and complaining about people knifing and request that knifing not be allowed because it's not a knifing server. I say rock on with your knifes and let the camping little wienies camp.

You should teach everyone else the priority of thawing!

This is the case law on the duration of a terry stop (reasonable suspicion) There isn't a set time period. Florida v. Royer, 460 US 491(1983)-An investigative detention must be conducted in a manner that is no more intrusive than necessary to establish or dispel the officer's suspicions. Reasonable Suspicion - A standard used in criminal procedure, more relaxed than probable cause, that can justify less-intrusive searches. For example, a reasonable suspicion justifies a stop and frisk, but not a full search. A reasonable suspicion exists when a reasonable person under the circumstances, would, based upon specific and articulable facts, suspect that a crime has been committed. The key to the stops demonstated in the videos of people open carrying is the 911 calls the Officers receive. The 911 call plus the Officer finding the person with the gun creates the reasonable suspicion to investigate what happened. Did the person do something with the gun that broke a law? Did they do nothing at all? Just because a person is stopped based on reasonable suspicion does not mean there must be probable cause that they broke the law. Once Probable Cause is established then an Officer may cite or arrest the person. This same rule applies to all calls for service not just these particular pedestrian stops. (i.e. DV, Assault, Theft, Burglary,DUI) The Officer has to take into account the totality of the circumstances. One more case... Florida v. J.L.,529 US 266 (2000)-An anonymous tip that a person is carrying a concealed weapon is not in and of itself enough to stop and frisk the person. On a side note I support Open Carry as well as Concealed Carry Laws. I think all persons are entitled to self protection under the 2nd amendment, not just in their home.

You had to edit your welcome? What an IDIOT! LoL Welcome to the forums mybullet. Always enjoy playing with you in game.

Only reasonable suspicion is required for a stop (Traffic or Pedestrian). Probable Cause is required for an arrest, warrant or search (Other than a Terry Pat Down or consent search) See Terry vs. Ohio. The man did not commit a crime in the video, and was not arrested. He was stopped based on the reasonable suspicion that was created by the 911 calls. Once the subject is stopped and found not to be breaking the law and is clear of wants and warrants they are free to go. Case law has found that if open carry is legal in a state, charging someone with disorderly conduct for causing alarm to the people that called 911 simply because of the person carrying the firearm does not supercede the second amendment. That is why they are released unless they are violating another law or have warrants. The sixth circuit also found it reasonable for Officers to request ID and run anyone stopped based on reasonable suspicion for wants and warrants. (Hiibel vs. Sixth Judicial District of Nevada) Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1(1968)-An officer can briefly detain a person, based upon reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, long enough to dispel the suspicion or to allow it to rise to the level of probable cause for an arrest. The officer is also permitted to do a limited "frisk" search of the person without a warrant. Before the officer can frisk search the subject, he must: Have articulable facts that the person could be armed with a weapon. Limit the search to pat searching the outer garments of the suspect to feel for objects that might be weapons. Only reach inside the clothing after feeling such objects. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004)-A police officer can require a person to identify himself/herself if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime.

Happy Birthday Johnny!

This one shows how it's suppose to be done.