hxtr

Hammer I can't see any proof of Nibiru there as I see them hallows around the moon as well. I think it is the material being sprayed in my opinion but no telling. Here is proof of Geoengineering.

No what?

I don't know anything about Nibaru but I know lots about Geoengineering. Check out this short video I made last night. It proves what I'm trying to explain about the wavy lines not moving as clouds move through the lines. My next Show will have more of these view in it. No audio this time I forgot to turn on the mic.. not needed. All you need is your eyes.

I have seen that one before.... Wish we could get some new ones. Great video.... and that is no lens flare. Lens flairs don't get covered by trees.

What did Cod do, get caught in the bathroom with some star at the mile high?

If it is Bullshit then you must know what all them wavy lines are in the clouds. What are all the wavy lines I see every single day in different locations. What weather patter makes squares out of the clouds? Please share what you know that I am missing.

Here you go Mexico.... Planes dump, clouds come and wavy lines form on the edge of the dry band. Do you see the wavy lines in the middle of this picture? Do you see the jet trails? Fiftine Minutes later... Same lines you will find in the Ocean at the edge of a dry band.

Sure glad Geoengineering does not exit. Trump presidency 'opens door' to planet-hacking geoengineer experiments As geoengineer advocates enter Trump administration, plans advance to spray sun-reflecting chemicals into atmosphere Read David Keith and Gernot Wagner’s response to this story Martin Lukacs @Martin_Lukacs Mon 27 Mar 2017 01.05 EDT Last modified on Thu 5 Jul 2018 16.51 EDT A ring around the sun, is seen over Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Friday, May 17, 2002. The halo is a rare effect on the sun caused by a layer of ice crystals in the atmosphere refracting light from the sun. Photograph: Lou Toman/AP Harvard engineers who launched the world’s biggest solar geoengineering research program may get a dangerous boost from Donald Trump, environmental organizations are warning. Under the Trump administration, enthusiasm appears to be growing for the controversial technology of solar geo-engineering, which aims to spray sulphate particles into the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s radiation back to space and decrease the temperature of Earth. Fear of solar geoengineering is healthy – but don't distort our research David W Keith and Gernot Wagner Read more Sometime in 2018, Harvard engineers David Keith and Frank Keutsch hope to test spraying from a high-altitude balloon over Arizona, in order to assess the risks and benefits of deployment on a larger scale. Keith cancelled a similar planned experiment in New Mexico in 2012, but announced he was ready for field testing at a geoengineering forum in Washington on Friday. “The context for discussing solar geoengineering research has changed substantially since we planned and funded this forum nearly one year ago,” a forum briefing paper noted. While geoengineering received little favour under Obama, high-level officials within the Trump administration have been long-time advocates for planetary-scale manipulation of Earth systems. David Schnare, an architect of Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency transition, has lobbied the US government and testified to Senate in favour of federal support for geoengineering. He has called for a multi-phase plan to fund research and conduct real-world testing within 18 months, deploy massive stratospheric spraying three years after, and continue spraying for a century, a duration geoengineers believe would be necessary to dial back the planet’s temperature. Geoengineers argue that such methods would be an inexpensive way to reduce global warming, but scientists have warned it could have catastrophic consequences for the Earth’s weather systems. Scientific modelling has shown that stratospheric spraying could drastically curtail rainfall throughout Asia, Africa and South America, causing severe droughts and threatening food supply for billions of people. The latest major Trump resignations and firings Read more “Clearly parts of the Trump administration are very willing to open the door to reckless schemes like David Keith’s, and may well have quietly given the nod to open-air experiments,” said Silvia Riberio, with technology watchdog ETC Group. “Worryingly, geoengineering may emerge as this administration’s preferred approach to global warming. In their view, building a big beautiful wall of sulphate in the sky could be a perfect excuse to allow uncontrolled fossil fuel extraction. We need to be focussing on radical emissions cuts, not dangerous and unjust technofixes.” A White House report on climate change research submitted to Congress in January called for the first time ever for research into geoengineering. Within Republican ranks, former House speaker and Trump confidant Newt Gingrich was one of the first to start publicly advocating for geoengineering. “Geoengineering holds forth the promise of addressing global warming concerns for just a few billion dollars a year,” he said in 2008, before helping launch a geoengineering unit while he ran the right-wing think tank American Economic Enterprise. “We would have an option to address global warming by rewarding scientific innovation. Bring on American ingenuity. Stop the green pig.” US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has also appeared to support geoengineering, describing climate change as an “engineering problem.” ExxonMobil’s funding of the climate denial industry is under investigation by attorney generals in the United States, but it’s less well known that ExxonMobil scientists under Tillerson’s reign as CEO were leading developers of geo-engineering technologies like carbon dioxide removal. Asked about solutions to climate change at an ExxonMobil shareholder meeting in 2015, Tillerson said that a “plan B has always been grounded in our beliefs around the continued evolution of technology and engineered solutions.” “We are not unalterably committed to doing the experiment,” said David Keith on Friday. “We’re headed down the road of doing that, but depending on what an advisory committee says and what we learn technically we’re certainly willing to stop. Our long term goal is to build a sustainable effort in solar geoengineering research that allows us to say more about ways it might actually provide public benefit.” Critics like Riberio point out that those who don’t believe in human-induced climate change may still support geoengineering, which can be presented as a method to deal with the consequences of a warming planet without stopping the burning of fossil fuels. The Harvard experiment may fly in the face of a moratorium on geoengineering adopted in 2010 by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, which was reaffirmed in December in Mexico. The United States is one of the few countries to not ratify the UN convention, creating a potential loophole for experiments. The experiment’s site in Tucson, Arizona may also invoke issues of jurisdictional controversy with Mexico – stratospheric winds can blow up to 200 miles per hour, and the border is only 75 miles away. Other geoengineering experiments like cloud whitening may go ahead in the United States, as well as experiments supported by the governments of China and Russia, though both are signatories to the UN moratorium.

Geoengineering does not exit huh? lol https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/ Topics The Download Magazine Events More Subscribe Log in / Create an account Search Sustainable Energy Harvard Scientists Moving Ahead on Plans for Atmospheric Geoengineering Experiments The climate researchers intend to launch a high-altitude balloon that would spray a small quantity of reflective particles into the stratosphere. by James Temple March 24, 2017 Harvard University professor David Keith A pair of Harvard climate scientists are preparing small-scale atmospheric experiments that could offer insights into the feasibility and risks of deliberately altering the climate to ease global warming. They would be among the earliest official geoengineering-related experiments conducted outside of a controlled laboratory or computer model, underscoring the growing sense of urgency among scientists to begin seriously studying the possibility as the threat of climate change mounts. Sometime next year, Harvard professors David Keith and Frank Keutsch hope to launch a high-altitude balloon, tethered to a gondola equipped with propellers and sensors, from a site in Tucson, Arizona. After initial engineering tests, the “StratoCruiser” would spray a fine mist of materials such as sulfur dioxide, alumina, or calcium carbonate into the stratosphere. The sensors would then measure the reflectivity of the particles, the degree to which they disperse or coalesce, and the way they interact with other compounds in the atmosphere. The researchers first proposed these balloon experiments in a 2014 paper. But at a geoengineering conference in Washington, D.C., on Friday, Keith said they have begun engineering design work with Arizona test balloon company World View Enterprises. They’ve also started discussions about the appropriate governance structure for such an experiment, and they plan to set up an independent body to review their proposals. “We would like to have the first flights next year,” he said at the Forum on U.S. Solar Geoengineering Research, held at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. In an earlier interview with MIT Technology Review, Keith stressed that the experiments would not be a binary test of geoengineering itself. But they should provide useful information about the proposed method that he has closely studied, known as solar radiation management. The basic idea is that spraying certain types of particles into the stratosphere could help reflect more heat back into space. Scientists believe it could work because nature already does it. Large volcanic eruptions in the past have blasted tens of millions of tons of sulfur dioxide into the sky, which contributed to lower global temperatures in subsequent months. What’s less clear is how precisely the technique could control worldwide temperatures, what materials would work best, and what the environmental side effects might be. Notably, previous volcanic eruptions have also decreased precipitation levels in parts of the world, and sulfur dioxide is known to deplete the protective ozone layer. Keith has previously used computer modeling to explore the possibility of using other materials that may have a neutral impact on ozone, including diamond dust and alumina. Late last year, he, Keutsch, and others published a paper that found using calcite, a mineral made up of calcium carbonate, “may cool the planet while simultaneously repairing the ozone layer.” The balloon tests could provide additional insight into how these chemicals actually interact with precursors to ozone in the real world and offer additional information that could help refine their understanding of solar geoengineering, he says: “You have to go measure things in the real world because nature surprises you.” Is it time for scientists to begin geoengineering-related experiments in the open air? Tell us what you think. Keith stresses that it’s too early to say whether any geoengineering technologies should ever be deployed. But he has argued for years that research should move ahead to better understand their capabilities and dangers, because it’s possible they could significantly reduce the risks of climate change. He stressed that the experiments would have negligible environment impacts, as they will involve no more than a kilogram of materials. Funding for the initial experiments would come from grants that Harvard provided Keith and Keutsch as new professors. Additional funds may come from Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program, a multidisciplinary effort launching this spring to study feasibility, risks, ethics, and governance issues surrounding geoengineering. As of press time, it had raised more than $7 million from Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, the Hewlett Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Harvard-internal funds, and other philanthropists. Geoengineering critics argue that the climate system is too complex to meddle with, that the environmental risks are too high, or that even talking about technological “fixes” could ease pressure to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Recommended for You EXCLUSIVE: Chinese scientists are creating CRISPR babies This is the first good picture from NASA’s InSight probe after it landed on Mars The Chinese scientist who claims he made CRISPR babies is under investigation An electric plane with no moving parts has made its first flight CRISPR inventor Feng Zhang calls for moratorium on gene-edited babies Only two known experiments have been carried out in the open air to date that could be considered geoengineering-related: University of California, San Diego, researchers sprayed smoke and salt particles off the coast of California as part of the E-PEACE experiment in 2011, and scientists in Russia dispersed aerosols from a helicopter and car in 2009. The so called SPICE experiment in the United Kingdom was quickly scuttled in 2012, following public criticism and conflict of interest accusations after several of the scientists applied for a related patent. In an earlier interview, Jane Long, a former associate director at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, stressed that researchers moving forward with geoengineering experiments need to go to great lengths to ensure proper public notification, opportunities for input, and appropriate oversight, particularly if they’re relying on private funds. But she said it’s time to begin seriously studying the technology’s potential given the growing dangers of climate change. “We should have started a decade ago,” she said. “It’s critical to know as much as we can as soon as we can.”

https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/ https://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2017/mar/27/trump-presidency-opens-door-to-planet-hacking-geoengineer-experiments http://www.etcgroup.org/content/trump-administration-geoengineering-administration

Today's crazy weather.... Missouri, Illinois, Tennessee, Virginia, Delaware, New Jersey for the most part get the HAARP wavy lines today. If see any of the pretty Chemtrails over Texas when I go outside I will take a picture. They are spraying Mexico Texas like bugs right now.. look at the last picture.

Closing plants in Canada and USA but not in Mexico. Punish GM by never buying one of their products ever again like I did for what they did to Detroit a long time ago. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/26/gm-unallocating-several-plants-in-2019-to-take-3-billion-to-3point8-billion-charge-in-future-quarters.html

Here is what you will see someday. The weather is going to get crazy. What we see now ain't nothing as it will be event after event. At some point... they will announce they must take steps combat the extreme weather changes and they will blame you and I for it. They will announce a Geoengineering program and the masses will except with open arms. The problem is they've been Geoengineering the entire time. Let's see in a year or 2 what happens.

A Fuck You with class!

WOW what a way to find out you are old.

That was funny Mr. Dos! Wait till he gets one of them women who desperately needs to see the Gynecologist, he will never look at a pussy the same ever again.... just like a Gynecologist.

You missed the porn at the end then. lol

Let's play! I am ready to go!

Holly crap.... how he held on is amazing. WOW!!!! What a mistake. Remind me never to go hang gliding... ever.

Answers above.

How about this... I can't even imagine how I was feeling back then. I remember all the details but the emotions that would push me to the edge.... all I know it was the worst internal feeling ever. Like some is standing on your emotions suffocating your thoughts in one direction. As if there is no other solution. Tunnel vision thoughts grouped in a self loathing that you just want to go away. What a dark place deep depression is. We all deal with situational depression but deep depression consumes you from the inside out. Every choice you make gets is filtered though the metal prison. I'm glad all them feelings are stuck in that emotional memory block. I like my happy laughing side much better. I try very hard to avoid going there at all costs, even terminating friendships, relationships you name it in an effort to avoid unnecessary stress. I tend to go over bard in them efforts at times but do it as a a self defense action. Better to go away then have this get bad. What is funny, now I know I was not allowed to die. Have had so many close calls in my life that I know now I will die when God is ready for me to die. That bastard! lol joking God.

YACCster I when thru that twice in my life. Died once.. bastards brought me back. I can tell you when the meds started kicking in I regretting it as well.. both times. That is the problem. I was on meds both times and MAN THAT SHIT MADE IT WORSE! Tell your friend get the fuck off fucking meds and find a new solution even pot. I have not been suicidal like that ever since. I blame the medication they give you to try and fix the problem. Everything got worse in my life when all I was trying to do was fix a bit of depression. It made me a different person in may ways. FUCK MAN MADE MEDS. Tell him to get on CBD oil... good shit not no head shop crap. Full Spectrum of the plant. How do you handle your friend.. no different than you did before. He is the same person as he was before... but he was suffering and probably medicated.

Crack I can just look at the news and get more content. I could of gone on for hours.

!Fu Crack!!!! Take that back. What you going to do?

They have been building underground bases since the 70's if not a bit earlier. They expected some kind of cataclysmic event like a nuclear war, asteroid, super volcano or some else big enough that they started to build bases underground. No telling what is down there. There are tunnels that from from one end of the USA to the other. In such an event Denver airport is the new hub as it has and underground base and tunnels go to it.