HarryWeezer

What Rugger picked out of his nose?

What Rugger found in is belly button?

Ejaculate from someone with a case of blue-balls?

So sorry to hear about your dogs HXTR. But as with the others, the most enjoyment I've had here in a while. Thanks!!!

Well done HXTR!!!!!!!!!!!

Welcome aboard Snoop. I have sent you an invite to join the clan Xfire gxroup.

Bonjour Fabe and welcome (sorry your wife's a tyrant)

All 26 victims were hit multiple times by rounds from a .223-caliber Bushmaster.

You didn't know? He's a high-priced, professional male prostitute specializing in widows over eighty; slaps it to 'em and cleans 'em out.

Thanks - posted that on my Facebook page where I hope some of the constant whiners get the message.

I'm sure all will go well Twinkie. We Tennesseans are a tough lot.

It's only Jan. 11 and we've already reached our Canuck quota for the year. Please move to the back of the line - We thank you! Welcome, regardless!!!

Sign on wall in my office: "Java Junkie: I drink coffee for your protection"

Greetings Cutie!!!

Welcome - beautiful country in your parts.

Welcome to our forums - hope to see you in COD5 where the real men hang out...

Yo Foxeye - delighted to see you in the forums. Holler if we can help 'ya.

Welcome to XI. I have sent you an invite to join the clan Xfire group.

True story: family living down the street with last name of Barr, named their daughter Candy.

Sorry to hear Banpire.

If by "credible news organization" you mean MSNBC, CNN, The Huffington Post or The Washington Times they are all liberal leaning news sources and often times choose not to report on incidents or news that is pro gun. Major news outlets are the most biased both left or right. The small Mom and Pop news outlets I find often report more facts without the slant. I disagree, large media outlets need veiwership to sell product. Without viewship, they would cease to exist. If they lose credibilty then who would wish to tune into that. Small internet outlets have nothing to lose, they dont fact check nor do even wish to do so. Their intregity isnt on the line and so they can print whatever. This is a prime case. Dont get me wrong, the large media outlets do have a political agenda and Fox News and MSNBC are the worst. You're right of course that most large media, print and broadcast, have a political bias but you're also correct that they understand their credibility is essential to their survival, particularly in the digital world we're in where any asshole can pretend to be a publisher or journalist and the more sensational their crap, the more page views they get and the more they make off advertising. The "credible" media will skew the news left or right depending on their bias, but at base, they don't usually fuck with the facts of a story, particularly one that's being well-covered. BurnnBright makes a good point: who do you believe? A good approach is to believe no one - take nothing at face value. If you wish to be well informed, and get as close to the "truth" of something as you can, you need to read multiple sources covering the same story. But take those sources from the major news outlets: the big newspapers, and Fox, CBS, CNN, NBC, ABC, etc.. - the more credible news agencies. Also include in your diet the foreign press (try bbc.co.uk and afp.com) which offer insight you don't get in America.

I told you guys to lock the freakin' door.

Really bad actors.

In attempting to check this out, I found dozens of pseudo "news" sites and various agenda-driven sites carrying this information, but not one credible news organization reporting on it with comment from Bank of America. That's one good indication this is a large load of shit. The other is basic common sense. This "story" says Bank of America "decided to hold the deposits for further review." What the hell does that mean? How can a bank "hold" deposits in a corporate account for any reason? It's not their money. The money belongs to the account holder and a bank, absent some court order, has no legal process that I'm aware of to seize funds in any account. And why would a bank want to "review" deposits? To what end? Doesn't make sense. As well, all banks have one objective: make money. They don't pursue political objectives - why would they? Lastly, Bank of America is one of the largest banks in the country and some "manager in the right department" of a local branch would hardly be voicing some corporate political objective. Bullshit.

All well and good, but it's not Yoburt's birthday. Chatted with him in game today and he said that while he appreciates the good wishes, his birthday is in July.