Izumi Posted May 22, 2023 Member ID: 2593 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 5 Topic Count: 62 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 490 Content Per Day: 0.10 Reputation: 977 Achievement Points: 5109 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 1 Joined: 06/13/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: October 2, 2024 Birthday: 11/20/1978 Device: Windows Posted May 22, 2023 (edited) Sweet. I've been busy working and its nice to see the shit posts continue. Gonna slap this sucker right here.... mmm... Edited May 22, 2023 by Izumi Wrong shit post, but so right. Awards
Sammy Posted May 23, 2023 Member ID: 3036 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 32 Topic Count: 219 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 9419 Content Per Day: 1.92 Reputation: 7515 Achievement Points: 62539 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/29/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: March 17 Birthday: 04/26/2008 Device: Windows Posted May 23, 2023 Funny video of Arnie channeling Whitney Houston, and the creator has made many more AI fakery is all the rage in the news lately of course. Should give everyone pause before believing anything they see on the internet and the media. Even legit media since they will buy into AI fakes also. Quite possible many here with investments in the market lost some money this morning because of an AI fake picture circulated in some foreign media as real. Various authorities had to respond and publicly reassure people it was fake. When one fake picture causes market losses one imagines what we will be seeing in the next two years when it comes to all the political fakes that will be made up compared to the last election. If this technology was around 6 years ago we would have seen a fully believable film of the infamous Trump 'pee video' as a so-called late October Surprise and a whole lot of people would have believed it without question. And Hillary would have been president. Awards
Sammy Posted May 23, 2023 Member ID: 3036 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 32 Topic Count: 219 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 9419 Content Per Day: 1.92 Reputation: 7515 Achievement Points: 62539 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/29/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: March 17 Birthday: 04/26/2008 Device: Windows Posted May 23, 2023 Awards
TheLastColdBeer Posted May 25, 2023 Member ID: 489 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 52 Topic Count: 553 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 4745 Content Per Day: 0.83 Reputation: 6058 Achievement Points: 42053 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 18 Joined: 09/22/09 Status: Offline Last Seen: December 23, 2024 Birthday: 01/09/1963 Device: Android Posted May 25, 2023 I've flipped through the report, Durham doesn't have the gift Navarro has of making his point quickly. It sure doesn't look good for the alphabet agencies attacking a candidate, and then a sitting president. If you have any doubts about the integrity of our government, this should put them to rest, on the negative side. If however, you consider this a viable representative of congress, all is rosy, and you can remain asleep. Spartacus 1 Awards
Sammy Posted May 27, 2023 Member ID: 3036 Group: ***- Inactive Clan Members Followers: 32 Topic Count: 219 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 9419 Content Per Day: 1.92 Reputation: 7515 Achievement Points: 62539 Solved Content: 0 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/29/11 Status: Offline Last Seen: March 17 Birthday: 04/26/2008 Device: Windows Posted May 27, 2023 The question is, would you replace this person with a younger version of her? The final result in effect being that votes wouldnt be any different? Or would you replace her with someone in your own image? Ask the most vocal voices using this argument and the answer is the latter. Age is just a convenient excuse for many to try and achieve their own partisan goals. Besides you can be younger, and look even younger than your actual years if you have the genes or the money, but still be a brainless and self-absorbed fool that I wouldnt let pump gas into my car. After all, look at next crop of presidential candidates. The two republicans, the front runner would be almost 80 if he won. The runner up, still in his 40's. Yet, if the primaries were all held today the old man would get the nomination. Of course we have an old man that Democrats will likely chose as their next candidate. Our two main contenders, chosen by both respective parties, old men. Then again, if you want to take simple numbers out of the equation (for both Trump and Biden), the easy argument used, but focus solely on health and physical + mental fitness how do you do that? And by whom? Full medical workups, with full data made public (HIPA not withstanding), by doctors with no bias or relations with the patient? Not simply 'he's good to go'? Psychologists for mental evaluations, also with data? Imagine if both had to pass extensive psychological exams. My guess, both would have failed. Would have had to be done before the first primary of course so primary voters could made different choices. Interesting to consider who those two would have been. Awards
Recommended Posts