We're talking about facts here, right? You make unsubstantiated implications like they should have a cure by now without any fact-based reasoning as to why, yet ironically question my judgment? Seriously, instead of wandering towards ad hominem like most people without facts, try making a reasonable explanation to support your claim in even this particular statement that they're holding out on a cure. I mean, forget the facts like one you stated that the virus mutates, that it invades the cells of the very system that is supposed to defend a body, that it goes dormant within cells, so that even if all circulating virus is removed it can become once again active in the future (which is also on branch of research). Just throw out a fantastical claim that they're withholding a cure without any factual proof, then 'expect me to know better' because you say so. You do see how utterly backwards your statements are? You're literally saying, unless I'm mistaken: Forget those facts, Tim (without explaining why) you should believe what I do without any scientific proof of any sort (without explaining why).