@Sharpe She doesn't 'come back' to most of the shit she says. That to which she does return is overhyped fear mongering for attention with sins of omission, that's why she's too busy booked with youtube appearances to return to further explain herself when invited. Every BIG danger she drums up is 'theoretical' & nothing that's happened. She really jumped the shark when she said taking a shit might pose a hazard vis a vis the sewer systems. Your sole reference is one which slants some cherry-picked theoretical that's never before happened in decades of practical application. She's doing what amounts to lying in her cherry picking & omission of hundreds of millions of people that have never had any of these worst case scenarios occur during viral & cancer treatments. It's all very disingenuous. None of the batches developed & used for vaccines have these contaminants. I've read the whole article, more than once. She's talking out both sides of her mouth & omitting what she knows are purity protocols that are used in end-stage production. I could go & copy & paste all of the information from the CDC, NIH, but it's all there if current facts are what's to be discussed, and not some what if's from one person in reference to early stage development. But I suspect the interest level will drop-off sharply.