Jump to content
Come try out the Arcade, Link at the top of the website ×

Recommended Posts


  • Member ID:  1238
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  1207
  • Topics Per Day:  0.22
  • Content Count:  6083
  • Content Per Day:  1.10
  • Reputation:   4985
  • Achievement Points:  50728
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  11
  • Joined:  03/12/10
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  

Posted

I am quite shocked by the revelation of the USA's "War Plan Red", devised in the 1930s for the purpose of waging war on "The Red Empire".  Who was the "Red Empire"?  The Chinese?  The Russians?  No - the United Kingdom and all its territories and dominions!  The principal theatre was to have been Canada with chemical weapon attacks included.  Very relieved that history followed a different path but I shall not view Douglas MacArthur, who signed this off, in the same way ever again...  Apparently, the document was declassified in 1974 causing a major stir in US-Canadian relations but I do not recall seeing or hearing about this at that time on this side of the Atlantic.  Perhaps it was too hot a potato and the press were persuaded not to carry it?

 

Here's the Daily Mail's article from Tuesday and the Wikipedia article on the topic...

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2039453/How-America-planned-destroy-BRITAIN-1930-bombing-raids-chemical-weapons.html

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Plan_Red

 

Had you read about this in the USA and Canada?

 



  • Member ID:  1634
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  26
  • Topic Count:  210
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1634
  • Content Per Day:  0.30
  • Reputation:   370
  • Achievement Points:  12427
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/03/10
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/19/1949

Posted

NO I cant say I have ever heard of this  news to me But MacArthu was How the term

war hawk got it's start. IMHO

He believed sence we were at it we should dominate the world I read something

to that effect years ago I just thought it was Russia and China.

Then He got fired Thanks I will read your links



  • Member ID:  174
  • Group:  +++ COD2 Head Admin
  • Followers:  130
  • Topic Count:  387
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  15027
  • Content Per Day:  2.62
  • Reputation:   8043
  • Achievement Points:  92206
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  59
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/23/1970
  • Device:  Macintosh

Posted

It seems like an odd situation but politics are never logical at times. The whole thing was just a theoretical exercise in military planning. The brass would have made better use of their resources planning for a war with Germany, but that wasn't politically expedient. They reasoned that planning for unlikely wars was better than no planning at all. War Plan Red was never intended to be put into action except in the event of a war with the United Kingdom, an eventuality that everyone would agree was highly unlikely after about 1900.

 

War Plan Red was one of many "color plans" developed in a fairly systematic way in the 1920s and '30s. Except for "Orange" (war with Japan), the plans were primarily academic exercises, lacking detail and offering only broad outlines of strategy. The plans were an outgrowth of military reorganizations that had led to the creation of the U.S. Army War College (1903) and the U.S. Army War Plans Division (1921).  Planning capability having been established, the military figured its planners had better get in some practice. The result was a dramatic increase in formal planning for various military contingencies, most of them unlikely. 

 

Lets face it, America was built on war & conflict, abroad and at home. Does this come as a suprise to anyone?. Better to be prepared than not...

 

 

 



  • Member ID:  51
  • Group:  Fallen Members
  • Followers:  51
  • Topic Count:  342
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  5974
  • Content Per Day:  1.04
  • Reputation:   3766
  • Achievement Points:  45818
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/01/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  06/26/1949

Posted

I think all Government have various contingency plane to cover any number of situations...What I think bothers me the most in this article is it said plans were made for pre-emptive strikes by the U.S. ...It's one thing to make plans in case of attack and an entirely different matter to make plans to be the aggressor and strike the first blow...Thank God good sense ruled and we became close allies...SmileSmile

Awards


  • Member ID:  2491
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  354
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   0
  • Achievement Points:  2140
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/11/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  Never
  • Birthday:  04/20/1961

Posted

i saw the program on tv last night very informative,i always thought the americans had to go through congress to declare war?,but the main thing that bothered me was the way they were going to use gas etc

it was never even used against the japanese,and god knows the us marines/army could have done with it on some of the islands,

how many troops would it have taken to run occupied canada?,and you have to wonder what would have the rest of the world have done?



  • Member ID:  174
  • Group:  +++ COD2 Head Admin
  • Followers:  130
  • Topic Count:  387
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  15027
  • Content Per Day:  2.62
  • Reputation:   8043
  • Achievement Points:  92206
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  59
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/23/1970
  • Device:  Macintosh

Posted

It never was intended to go past the planning stage, logistically it would have been difficult to occupy such a large area.



  • Member ID:  607
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  76
  • Topic Count:  246
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  3367
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   2718
  • Achievement Points:  34252
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  10/21/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  09/16/1966
  • Device:  Windows

Posted

Hell thats IT we Brits should kick your American butts and teach you a lesson once and for all Tongue out

How about a trans atlantic Cod 4 scrim Hardcore style



  • Member ID:  220
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  147
  • Topic Count:  595
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  16950
  • Content Per Day:  2.96
  • Reputation:   13538
  • Achievement Points:  129714
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  120
  • Joined:  09/04/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/05/1970

Posted
baldie

Hell thats IT we Brits should kick your American butts and teach you a lesson once and for all Tongue out

How about a trans atlantic Cod 4 scrim Hardcore style

sure if you can handle losing. I will be happy to win. lol



  • Member ID:  607
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  76
  • Topic Count:  246
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  3367
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   2718
  • Achievement Points:  34252
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  12
  • Joined:  10/21/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  09/16/1966
  • Device:  Windows

Posted
hxtr
baldie

Hell thats IT we Brits should kick your American butts and teach you a lesson once and for all Tongue out

How about a trans atlantic Cod 4 scrim Hardcore style

sure if you can handle losing. I will be happy to win. lol

 Bring it on us bad boys will kick your ass Wink


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.