Harry, the media's reputation over here is at an all-time(?) low due to the behaviour of some journalists - phone-hacking a murder victim's voicemail is just one example of "investigative journalism" in the UK!
"Newspaper" is a word that embellishes the rubbish printed these days. There are still people willing to believe what is printed in them - can you believe that?! They are all owned by vested interests of various political persuasions so one is rarely going to read something not tainted by spin.
The publishers complain that their circulations are falling... Oh really?? They don't say... The papers are useful for wrapping up food waste and lining kitty litter trays but little else.
I rely on online sources for real news - Reuters and PA are good to see the raw stories before some "journalist" mutates them into fiction. Even so, I tend to verify anything before allowing it to raise my blood pressure too much. I was once telephoned by a major UK tabloid newspaper about a recent case one of my colleagues had dealt with. I refused to discuss it and referred him to our Press Officer at HQ. "If you won't talk to us, we'll make it up", said the hack. And, guess what...they did!
Celeb "news"? I'm with you - who gives a sh*t?! If they do something worthwhile for humanity, I want to read about it, not if they break a nail or buy a new hat.