Jump to content
Come try out the Arcade, Link at the top of the website ×

Recommended Posts


  • Member ID:  87
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  58
  • Topic Count:  98
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3789
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   3589
  • Achievement Points:  27251
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/02/1871

Posted

oh yea i almost forgot  1FU HXTR



  • Member ID:  1482
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  37
  • Topic Count:  120
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  2018
  • Content Per Day:  0.37
  • Reputation:   1440
  • Achievement Points:  15303
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/05/10
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/13/1967
  • Device:  Windows

Posted

also no traces of an airplane in the VERY LIMITED footage released of the most watched and secured building on the planet. It just doesn't add up.

 

Also, look at the shape of the hole, now google image search airplane crashes...     not a chance!

 

A lot of people bring up the impossible flight path that would be required based on when the "plane" was last tracked on radar. I don't know much about that though. Best analogy I've heard is that it's like saying a semitruck is being blamed for running a car off the road when it was seen at the top of a mountain 2 minutes before the crash.

 

Anyway... I'm a logical man. I don't think it adds up. Whatever the government is trying to cover up could be anything... maybe inside job? Maybe there were just details that they found embarassing? Who knows... It could mean anything. All I know is the story they released to the media to shove down the throats of everybody is not the whole truth.

lets not forget that the pentagon is an armored building and that section of the building was just finished with the armor upgrades, if it was any other building of its size things would of been much, much worse.



  • Member ID:  1482
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  37
  • Topic Count:  120
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  2018
  • Content Per Day:  0.37
  • Reputation:   1440
  • Achievement Points:  15303
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/05/10
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/13/1967
  • Device:  Windows

Posted

 

crazy info-.jet  fuel is a mixture of diesel and doesnt burn hot enuff to melt steel industrial girders yet those 3 buildings fell from jet fuel and fire-the building fell too fast at free fall speed-it -numerous firefighters and witnesses say there were multiple explosions throughout the buildings which seems unrealistic to a fire collapse.then the pictures we all see of the steel girders from the base all seem to be sheered or cut on angles not just bent over

and a hole in the pentagon smaller then the plane that was to crash into it.and very little debris-no hjoles for the wings and no huge debris from the wings were  about..weve all seen plane debris from crashes spread out for miles but there was little debris..

 

 

how bout on that day at that time they were having war drills about  planes being hijacked and our jets were all scrambled away and had to double back  supposedly.weird shit like this...

 

also the bbc talking about the 3rd building coming down previous to it  falling with live coverage of the actual building in the background which hadn't even fallen yet....wtf

 

Silverstein even talking about his building 7 being pulled meaning demolitioned down-that takes sometimes days to setup explosives  by demolition  crews-wtf!!

  • i dont know what occured but there is completely weird and unexplainable shit that goes against all reason and logic its very frightening to me

 

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800º to 1500ºF, not hot enough to melt steel (2750ºF). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."



  • Member ID:  51
  • Group:  Fallen Members
  • Followers:  51
  • Topic Count:  342
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  5974
  • Content Per Day:  1.04
  • Reputation:   3766
  • Achievement Points:  45818
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/01/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  06/26/1949

Posted

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800º to 1500ºF, not hot enough to melt steel (2750ºF). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

 

At those temperatures concrete will explode...

Awards


  • Member ID:  20343
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  90
  • Topic Count:  205
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  3407
  • Content Per Day:  0.80
  • Reputation:   3084
  • Achievement Points:  30326
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/11/13
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/01/1983
  • Device:  Macintosh

Posted

 

then the shit with osamma and some reports he died years earlier and then they say we dumped his body in the ocean?just too many questionable things they leave themselves open for-why wouldnt they keep him alive first of all to question the most evil person on the planet?Then not to hold his body as proof they had it?just dumb shit like that always

  1. this indian politician being interviewed by david frost says osamma  was murdered years earlier then of course she was assassinated shortly after this..frightening to think

 

 

She was not Indian, she was a Pakistani politician, and former Prime Minister. Now deceased, she was assassinated in 2007.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.