Jump to content
Come try out the Arcade, Link at the top of the website ×

Recommended Posts


  • Member ID:  934
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  19
  • Topic Count:  131
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  832
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   137
  • Achievement Points:  5656
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/27/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  08/16/1960

Posted

1. If you arm all passengers the likelyhood of a completed terrorist attack becomes voided.

 

2. If you know it's going to happen why not block it from takeoff?

 

As stated above, too many variables, but in the time off crisis, that may be all you have.



  • Member ID:  2570
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  197
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   11
  • Achievement Points:  1170
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/08/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  

Posted

1. If you arm all passengers the likelyhood of a completed terrorist attack becomes voided.

 

2. If you know it's going to happen why not block it from takeoff?

 

As stated above, too many variables, but in the time off crisis, that may be all you have.

Most hijackers hijack the planes some minutes or hours after takeoff

I know there are too many variables, but it's about the moral and ethical reasons to shoot it down or not to shoot it down and to decide on the background of these arguments

Awards


  • Member ID:  238
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  189
  • Topic Count:  75
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2162
  • Content Per Day:  0.38
  • Reputation:   1940
  • Achievement Points:  19609
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/04/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/09/1957

Posted

Shoot it down if it flies over Canada they will not know the difference and they might try to smoke the jet fuel just ask Pete.



  • Member ID:  42
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  50
  • Topic Count:  338
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  8389
  • Content Per Day:  1.47
  • Reputation:   6126
  • Achievement Points:  54468
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  09/01/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  01/30/1959
  • Device:  Windows

Posted

Hey if something like that would happen in Canada they would have to go to Quebec first and then learn french before they could continue. Its part of some language right bill they passed when they were all upity on separating. And they better not piss of the PQ they get all mean and chatty like when you fool around with Canada's officaial language



  • Member ID:  783
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  25
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  283
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   27
  • Achievement Points:  1698
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/23/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/10/1990

Posted

Unfortunately, there's not enough information to make a good decision. With just that info, I'd sit and wait it out. But, at the end of the day, if it's a choice between shooting down an airline, or letting it crash into a building, it's going to get shot down.

 

Plus, I highly doubt an terrorist could get away with hijacking an airline today. We learned our lessons from 9/11. The only way to hijack an airline would be to kill everyone on board. Otherwise, you're going to have a swift and violent insurrection on your hands.



  • Member ID:  2570
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  197
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   11
  • Achievement Points:  1170
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/08/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  

Posted

the problem about that is, that you never know for sure whether they will crash into any important building or not.

Awards


  • Member ID:  2470
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  131
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   52
  • Achievement Points:  1335
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/08/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/01/1952

Posted

Chuck norris uses Segal for cereal and Bruce lee as the chop sticks to eat said segal flakes :) . And everybody has a 200 mile limit assuming they cross it palne goes boom when its safe to make it go boom. The many is more important.

Thats funny.. a friend of mine trains Segal and all of his Friends how to use guns in all his movies and I think he would have someting to say about this, Chuck dose rock though,

Cheers



  • Member ID:  79
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  227
  • Topic Count:  228
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  3443
  • Content Per Day:  0.60
  • Reputation:   4051
  • Achievement Points:  30283
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  06/29/1977
  • Device:  iPhone


  • Member ID:  22349
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  766
  • Content Per Day:  0.20
  • Reputation:   3
  • Achievement Points:  4612
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/15/15
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  

Posted (edited)

I think location is important on this one. If it's over Washington DC, NYC, LA, or within range of a nuclear power plant, etc you gotta put 'er down. It would be nice if you could just freeze the bastard.

Edited by Boo Yaa


  • Member ID:  138
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  63
  • Topic Count:  475
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  4471
  • Content Per Day:  0.78
  • Reputation:   2925
  • Achievement Points:  30761
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  14
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/01/1974
  • Device:  Android

Posted (edited)

i would say send in us idiots hxtr with a joint in his mouth me pissed outta ma skull dread on his bike cobra in his car and bud dressed as a clown and good old rugger scratching his head wtf wtf i dooo lol

 

server has been restarted :w00t:

Edited by Ricko


  • Member ID:  169
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  176
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   107
  • Achievement Points:  1355
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  03/24/1953

Posted

Depends on the terrorists intentions,

if they are just wanting to be allowed to land somwhere, then you would let the game run, because once on the ground the state has options.

1,(Negotiate)

2,(do something to incapacitate the terrorists, drugs in food drink etc)

3,(Finally, if all else fails, storm the plane - at least some of the innocents will survive)

 

However if it's a situation like 9/11, where the intention is to crash the plane, then the only option is to bring it down first.

(Because the innocents are going to die whichever course of action you follow)

Having said all that it wouldn't be a decision I would wish for anybody to have to make - and I hope it never comes to that.

Awards


  • Member ID:  220
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  147
  • Topic Count:  595
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  16950
  • Content Per Day:  2.96
  • Reputation:   13538
  • Achievement Points:  129714
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  120
  • Joined:  09/04/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  04/05/1970

Posted

i say if you hijack our plane.. we nuke your country. That will stop all this shit for good.



  • Member ID:  822
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  87
  • Topic Count:  317
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  5477
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5025
  • Achievement Points:  42632
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  12/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  03/01/1967


  • Member ID:  3081
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  298
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   103
  • Achievement Points:  2431
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/18/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  03/26/1982

Posted

Jonny when it comes to the only variables being morals and ethics you are fucked either way you go. Everyone has different morals and ethical standards as you have seen in the post itself. What you have to think of is what it will take for people to go against their morals or ethical views to save others. No one would want to take out a plane full of people. (Sorry no matter what any of you say it would bring tears to your eyes if you had to make a choice of taking down a plane with your family or children on it.) A lot of people would tell you to take out the plane, but when if comes to that person actually making that decision things become more complicated mentally. Take out a hundred to save a thousand, yes this seems to be the better of your choices given. It makes more sense, but as stated there are so many more routes to take now that we have had the 9/11 attacks.



  • Member ID:  88
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  32
  • Topic Count:  249
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  3510
  • Content Per Day:  0.61
  • Reputation:   1893
  • Achievement Points:  23116
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  11/13/1991
  • Device:  Android

Posted

I would send Bruce Willis he is familiar with these issues.

LOL Bruce Willis.....


  • Member ID:  715
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  418
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2178
  • Content Per Day:  0.39
  • Reputation:   1183
  • Achievement Points:  16606
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  11/09/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  11/04/1943

Posted

Rarely is there an easier question to answer on these boards, shoot it down.



  • Member ID:  238
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  189
  • Topic Count:  75
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2162
  • Content Per Day:  0.38
  • Reputation:   1940
  • Achievement Points:  19609
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/04/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  07/09/1957

Posted

Bruce Willis or Samuel L Jackson either one has plane experience. LMAO



  • Member ID:  2570
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  197
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   11
  • Achievement Points:  1170
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/08/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  

Posted

would be cool if I could get 4-5 serious opinions in the next time. I know it's a very general question without many details, but I would like to get a few more feedback to that general question.

Awards


  • Member ID:  2277
  • Group:  **- Inactive Registered Users
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  15
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   1
  • Achievement Points:  95
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/05/11
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  01/27/1975

Posted

i also agree to send in chuck norris.



  • Member ID:  3560
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  38
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   30
  • Achievement Points:  384
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/12
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  11/25/1962

Posted

1. Society Moral's... The terrorist's have weapon's .... passenger's will die...... if terrorist's survive, year's of appeal's and we feed the bastard's

 

2.Animal Moral's ..... ever see what happen's when ya fuck with a lion's cub ................. swift justice, death to the intruder ... no appeal's , no cost to the people...............

 

3.Answer to question: No, as head of state, I do not have the right to end live's .................. I would not order it ...." The passenger's have the right to fight to live" ................ Question : why isnt the cockpit protected by airmarshel's ........ and why isnt there at least 3 more throughout the plane............ cause one marshel just don't cut it ............

Awards


  • Member ID:  96
  • Group:  ** Registered Users
  • Followers:  108
  • Topic Count:  1049
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  8817
  • Content Per Day:  1.54
  • Reputation:   3309
  • Achievement Points:  62219
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  09/02/09
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  06/30/1954
  • Device:  Windows

Posted


  • Member ID:  3380
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  63
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  376
  • Content Per Day:  0.08
  • Reputation:   171
  • Achievement Points:  3170
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/15/12
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  08/18/1965

Posted

i guess it's the same dilemna when US govt has to decide to use nuclear weapon on Japan. Killing thousands to ensure that millions wouldn't... and they choosed to use it, so if this airplane thread was at a big major city range, i think i'd shoot it down.



  • Member ID:  2048
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  294
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  6689
  • Content Per Day:  1.27
  • Reputation:   4709
  • Achievement Points:  48999
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  12/15/10
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  05/30/1967

Posted (edited)

im sure the people that would be in charge would shoot it down because they probably would not have there own kids or family members on that flight..otherwise they would negotiate like they always do then eventually take out the hi jackers like they have in the past.

 

if your child or grandchild was on that flight would you be so quick to take there life to save many other lives??

Edited by Damage_inc-

  • 2 weeks later...

  • Member ID:  3380
  • Group:  ***- Inactive Clan Members
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  63
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  376
  • Content Per Day:  0.08
  • Reputation:   171
  • Achievement Points:  3170
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/15/12
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  08/18/1965

Posted

Well, this is all the point. So then, why do mothers let their sons go to war? One has to know that liberty has no price, even a mother's tears.



  • Member ID:  3552
  • Group:  *** Clan Members
  • Followers:  18
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  177
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   135
  • Achievement Points:  1509
  • Solved Content:  0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/16/12
  • Status:  Offline
  • Last Seen:  
  • Birthday:  05/03/1982
  • Device:  Windows

Posted

i agree with hxtr, save the people on the ground and blow that fucker out of the sky. maybe by doing that the terrorist will leave the damn airplanes alone.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.