All Activity

damn another great admin stepping down thx for all the hard work

you did a great job thx for all the hard work

Roxy! Are you still going to play as much? Miss you

Happy birthday!!!!!!! Hunter your lucky year 77!!!!!!

Happy Birthday and have a great day

Happy Birthday.

The transgression related to a flexi-wing breach, with four bolts found to be missing from the rear wing support mechanism compared to the car’s homolgation form. That resulted in a rear-wing deflection reading of 52 millimetres under load, 37mm more than the permitted maximum of 15mm. The stewards’ statement read: “Following post-race scrutineering, it has been determined that Car No. 50 does not comply with the applicable technical regulations. “The identified irregularities were identified: “Missing Components on Rear Wing Support: Four bolts were found to be missing from the rear wing support, as per the car’s homologation form. “The Team Manager confirmed and accepted the non-compliance with the homologation specifications. “Rear Wing Deflection: A rear wing deflection of 52 mm was recorded during the post-race test, while Article 3.8.7 of the LMH Technical Regulations sets the maximum permissible deflection at 15 mm. “The Team Manager accepted the result and confirmed the correctness of the test procedure carried out by the scrutineers. The Competitor did not dispute the measurement. “Arguments of the Competitor: During the hearing, the Competitor stated that the excessive deflection was linked to the missing bolts and claimed no performance gain was achieved. “They further explained that during the last pit stop at 15:23, a mechanic noticed the absence of only one bolt on the rear wing support, but no corrective action was taken before the end of the race. “This decision was made after reviewing the car telemetry, which allegedly showed no change in the car’s speed. “The Stewards noted that Car 50 achieved its highest top speed on lap 380 out of 387. “Sanction and its proportionality: It is established jurisprudence in motorsport that non-compliance with technical regulations leads to disqualification, unless exceptional circumstances are proven, which was not claimed in this case. “Moreover, the scrutineers considered the rear wing assembly’s non-compliance to present a potential safety risk. “Specifically, the irregular and incomplete assembly of the rear wing support presents a risk of structural failure under high-speed stress or fatigue, which cannot be overlooked. “For these reasons, and pursuant to the applicable sporting and technical regulations, Car No. 50 is disqualified from the final classification of the race. “Competitors are reminded of their right to appeal certain decisions of the Stewards, in accordance with Article 15 of the FIA International Sporting Code and Chapter 4 of the FIA Judicial and Disciplinary Rules, within the applicable time limits

XtremeIdiots would like to wish all members celebrating their birthday today a happy birthday. Hunter1948 (77)inciuciuna (56)

Yup. Pretty wild. A LOT of drinking by pretty much everyone that night and then everyone drove home. It's more common that most people think, but when the cops are the ones doing it, you know the corruption runs deep.

Oh I guess they found her not guilty. Now she can sue the state for wrongful prosecution.

All the other cops that were partying were DUI also? One drove to the police station and moved cars in the parking lot DUI also! Such bullshit. Also they really didn't give evidence in the trial about DUI just that they claim she did.

Hope that in days ahead it work out for you

Wow! How many millions of dollars for a DUI. Crazy.